Mithriv Communication

Mithriv Conversation Stack Scenario Mapping

The Intelligence Engine correlates events across every system, applies your operational doctrine, and executes responses in milliseconds, while keeping humans in command.

- ms

Average Response Execution

- +

Sites Connected

-

Countries

-%+

Alarm Noise Elimination

IN THIS ARTICLE

The Conversation Stack

Conversation Design

Failure Modes and Guardrails

Operational Scenarios

Industry Requirements

Integration

Deployment

Technical Specifications

Section 01 |

The Conversation Stack

The Conversation Stack

Layer Details

Stakeholders interact through their preferred channel. The normalization layer converts all inputs to a common conversation format.

Before intent processing, the system determines who is speaking. Resolution methods cascade by channel

The system determines what the stakeholder needs. This is not a keyword matcher—it's a domain-tuned language model that understands security context.

Stakeholders interact through their preferred channel. The normalization layer converts all inputs to a common conversation format.

Every action the system takes passes through policy evaluation.

Every conversation generates an immutable audit record

Section 02 |

Conversation Design

How Agents Handle Real Interactions

Conversation examples showing how agents handle successful paths, ambiguity, authentication challenges, and edge cases.

Section 03 |

Failure Modes and Guardrails

What Happens When Things Go Wrong

Conversation AI in security operations must fail gracefully. Here's how the Communication Interface handles system failures, adversarial inputs, and edge cases.

Section 04 |

Operational Scenarios

Communication in Action

End-to-end scenarios showing how the Communication Interface coordinates across channels, stakeholders, and systems.

Section 05 |

Industry Requirements

Built for Environments With Specific Communication Mandates

Each industry has communication requirements shaped by regulation, liability, and operational necessity. The Communication Interface is configured, not customized, for each environment.

Regulatory context: ABA Model Rule 1.6 requires lawyers to "make reasonable efforts to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of, or unauthorized access to, information relating to the representation of a client." This duty extends to physical security.

Communication requirements addressed:

Regulatory context: HIPAA permits facility directories but requires patient consent. Workplace violence affects 75% of healthcare assaults. The Joint Commission requires documented emergency procedures.

Communication requirements addressed:

Regulatory context: NERC CIP-006-6 mandates continuous escorted access for visitors within Physical Security Perimeters, alerts to security personnel within 15 minutes of unauthorized access, and 90-day log retention.

Communication requirements addressed:

Regulatory context: TSA TWIC requirements, multi-agency coordination (CBP, Coast Guard, local LE), and high-volume international operations with language barriers.

Communication requirements addressed:

Section 06 |

Integration

Connects to Everything in Your Security Stack

The Communication Interface works through the Integration Fabric. Every system that touches security or workplace operations can participate in conversation flows.

Section 07 |

Deployment

From Assessment to Production

Implementation follows a structured path designed for enterprise security operations.

Assessment

2-3 weeks

Document current communication flows and pain points

Map stakeholder types and interaction patterns

Identify integration requirements

Define authorization policies and escalation paths

Establish success metrics

Configuration

3-4 weeks

Deploy Integration Fabric connections

Configure agent scopes and authorization rules

Develop site-specific conversation content (safety briefings, wayfinding)

Integrate identity systems

Configure channels (kiosk, mobile, Teams, radio)

Pilot

4-6 weeks

Deploy to single site or controlled stakeholder group

Parallel operation with existing processes

Collect conversation logs and failure cases

Refine based on real usage

Train security operations staff

Production

Ongoing

Expand to additional sites/stakeholder groups

Continuous monitoring and refinement

Regular authorization policy review

Incident response procedure updates

Performance optimization

Section 08 |

Technical Specifications

Performance and Reliability

Related resources