Mithriv Intelligence Engine

The Decision Layer for Physical Security

The Intelligence Engine correlates events across every system, applies your operational doctrine, and executes responses in milliseconds, while keeping humans in command.

- +

Pre-built Integrations

- +

Sites Connected

-

Countries

-%

Uptime

IN THIS ARTICLE

The Response Gap

The Intelligence Gap

The Reasoning Framework

How the Intelligence Engine Works

Graduated Autonomy

Operational Scenarios

Audit-Ready by Default

Clear Expectations

From Assessment to Production

What Intelligence Delivers

The Decision Layer

Section 01 |

The Response Gap

Millisecond Detection. Minute-Long Response.

Your security stack detects threats in milliseconds.

Your cameras identify unauthorized access at T+0. Your access control logs the badge attempt at T+50ms. Your analytics engine flags the anomaly at T+200ms.

Then the waiting begins.

Section 02 |

The Intelligence Gap

Connected Systems Need Connected Understanding

The Integration Fabric brings your security systems into one operational model. Real-time state across access control, video, visitor management, building systems, and identity.

The Intelligence Engine makes that unified data actionable.

Consider three events within 60 seconds:

  1. Badge tap denied at server room door (credential lacks authorization)
  2. Motion detected in adjacent corridor
  3. Fire door opened in same building wing

The Intelligence Engine correlates: The badge belongs to a terminated contractor whose credentials should have been revoked three weeks ago. The motion is that contractor walking toward an alternative entrance. The fire door is their attempt to bypass access control.Three events. One threat. One coordinated response.

The pattern across security operations:

Section 03 |

 The Reasoning Framework

From Detection to Decision

The Intelligence Engine operates through four concurrent capabilities:

Intelligence Capability Framework

Four interconnected nodes that expand when selected, showing detailed capability descriptions and operational examples.

Understanding events in relation to identity, location, time, history, and organizational context.

Example output:

"Marketing director attempted data center access at 2 AM, firstattempt ever at this location, 3 weeks after announcement ofcompetitor job offer. Behavioral deviation score: 94."

Requires:

Real-time state across all systems, identity resolution, behavioral baselines, organizational data

Applying your operational doctrine, SOPs, policies, escalation 
paths, to correlated events automatically.

Example output:

"Event matches SOP 4.2.1 (Insider Threat Protocol). Required actions: Notify CISO within 15 minutes, preserve video evidence, document in HR system, do not confront directly."

Requires:

Encoded SOPs, policy hierarchies, exception handling, compliance requirements by jurisdiction

Evaluating threat probability and impact based on patterns
across time, sites, and historical incidents.

Example output:

"Motion pattern consistent with vehicle reconnaissance. Third occurrence this week. Previous incidents preceded theft at similar facilities. Threat probability: ELEVATED. Recommended: Enhanced patrol, law enforcement notification."

Requires:

Historical incident correlation, cross-site pattern analysis, threat modeling, environmental factors

Initiating appropriate responses through connected systems, doors, cameras, credentials, communications, documentation.

Example output:

Guard dispatched via radio with location, video clip of subject, access history, and recommended approach. Relevant doors locked. Cameras tracking. Evidence preservation initiated. Incident record created.

Requires:

Requires: Bidirectional system control, action authorization framework, audit trail, rollback capability

Section 04 |

How the Intelligence Engine Works

Reasoning at Machine Speed. Control at Human Discretion.

The Intelligence Engine is the decision layer that sits atop the Integration Fabric and connects to stakeholders through the Communication Interface.

The Reasoning Core (Can connect to above)

The Reasoning Core processes events from the Integration Fabric through four concurrent analysis paths:

Identity Resolution

Who is involved? Employee, visitor, contractor, unknown? Role, clearance level, normal behavior pattern. Location appropriateness for this identity at this time.

Spatial-Temporal Analysis

Location and timing context. Adjacent space activity. Historical patterns for this location. Facility schedule alignment.

Behavioral Baseline Comparison

Deviation from individual patterns. Deviation from role patterns. Deviation from location patterns. Peer comparison analysis.

Threat Pattern Matching

Known threat indicator correlation. Reconnaissance pattern detection. Social engineering signature matching. Insider threat progression identification.

These analyses complete in parallel. The Reasoning Core synthesizes results into a threat assessment with confidence scores, recommended actions, and supporting evidence, within 600 milliseconds.

The Doctrine Library

Your operational doctrine, SOPs, policies, compliance requirements, encoded as executable logic

The Action Framework

The bridge between decision and execution.

Authorizes

Evaluates whether the Intelligence Engine can execute autonomously or requires human approval, based on action type, confidence level, and configured boundaries.

Executes

Initiates actions through the Integration Fabric: door locks, camera presets, credential updates, guard dispatch, notifications, evidence preservation.

Audits

Logs every decision, every action, every outcome with full reasoning chain. Export-ready for compliance, legal, and insurance.

Learns

Tracks outcomes. When human operators override recommendations, the system captures the correction for supervised learning.

The Learning Layer

Intelligence that improves through operation.

Section 05 |

Graduated Autonomy

You Define the Boundaries. The System Respects Them.

The Intelligence Engine operates within a graduated autonomy model, a progression where you control what executes automatically, what requires approval, and what remains purely advisory.

AUTONOMY SPECTRUM

The Intelligence Engine monitors, correlates, and assesses.All responses require human initiation.

Deployment context: Initial deployment, building trust, highly regulated environments, situations requiring 100% humanaccountability

System executes automatically:

  • Correlates events across systems
  • Generates threat assessments with confidence scores
  • Recommends actions with reasoning
  • Prepares evidence packages
  • Creates audit documentation

Human role:

  • Reviews all assessments
  • Decides on all responses
  • Initiates all actions
  • Validates all outcomes

The Intelligence Engine recommends specific actions withone-click execution. Humans approve before execution.

Deployment context: Standard operations, situations requiring human judgment, actions with significant consequences

System executes automatically:

  • All L0 capabilities, plus:
  • Pre-stages recommended actions for approval
  • Prepares communications for human review
  • Queues guard dispatch with full context
  • Drafts incident reports

Human role:

  • Reviews recommendations
  • Approves or modifies actions
  • Executes pre-staged responses with single click
  • Reviews and sends prepared communications

The Intelligence Engine executes routine actions automatically. Significant decisions escalate for approval.

Deployment context: Mature deployments, well-understood scenarios, time-critical routine responses

System executes automatically:

  • Suppress known false-positive patterns
  • Route alerts to appropriate queues
  • Attach video clips to incidents
  • Create standard documentation
  • Send routine notifications

Human role:

  • Credential revocations
  • Physical lockdowns
  • External communications
  • Actions affecting VIPs
  • Novel threat patterns

The Intelligence Engine operates autonomously within definedboundaries. Humans handle exceptions and strategic decisions.

Deployment context: High-volume environments, after-hoursoperations, scenarios with proven playbooks, time-criticalresponses

System executes automatically:

  • Complete SOP execution for known scenarios
  • Credential lifecycle (provision/suspend/revoke)
  • Guard dispatch and coordination
  • Evidence preservation
  • Compliance documentation
  • Compliance documentation

Human role:

  • Actions outside defined boundaries
  • Low-confidence assessments
  • Novel patterns without playbooks
  • High-impact decisions
  • Policy exceptions

Human focus:

  • Exception handling
  • Strategic decisions
  • Policy refinement
  • Relationship management
  • Continuous improvement

Simulation Playground

Before any automation goes live, test it.
The Simulation Playground runs your SOPs against historical incidents, synthetic scenarios, and edge cases. See exactly how the Intelligence Engine responds. Identify gaps. Refine policies. Build confidence

What the Simulation Playground reveals:

  • SOP gaps: Scenarios your current procedures don't address
  • Timing optimization: Where response sequences can be accelerated
  • Threshold calibration: Confidence level tuning for appropriate action triggers
  • Edge case handling: System behavior in ambiguous situations
  • Compliance alignment: Automated response verification against regulatory requirements

Run simulations before deployment. Run them after policy changes. Run them when regulations update.

Section 06 |

Operational Scenarios

What Security Intelligence Delivers

These scenarios demonstrate how the Intelligence Engine transforms specific operational challenges, from VIP management to emergency response.

Section 07 |

 Audit-Ready by Default

Documentation That Generates Itself

When every decision flows through a unified intelligence layer, compliance becomes a byproduct of operation.

What the Intelligence Engine provides:

Every decision, every action, every outcome logged with:

Complete reasoning chain

Why the system made each assessment

Evidence linkage

Video, access logs, communications attached

Policy mapping

Which SOP, policy, or regulation governed the response

Timestamp precision

Millisecond accuracy across all systems

Immutable storage

Tamper-evident logging for legal defensibility

Frameworks addressed

Audit preparation

Section 08 |

Clear Expectations

What the Intelligence Engine Is, and Isn't

Where the Intelligence Engine excels:

High-alert-volume environments

where operators cannot process every event manually

Multi-site operations

requiring consistent response regardless of local staffing

Organizations with documented SOPs

that can be encoded as executable doctrine

Environments with integrated systems

providing data for correlation

Operations with compliance burden

where documentation must be comprehensive

Facilities with turnover challenges

where institutional knowledge must persist

Where other approaches may fit better:

Single-site operations

with low alert volume and stable, experienced staff

Organizations without documented procedures

(we can help develop them, but the Intelligence Engine requires operational doctrine)

Facilities with minimal system integration

(Intelligence requires data; start with the Integration Fabric)

Environments requiring 100% human decision-making

for regulatory or policy reasons

The honest tradeoff:

The Intelligence Engine operates within the boundaries of its training data and encoded doctrine. It excels at pattern recognition, correlation, and rapid response within known scenarios. Novel situations, strategic decisions, and sensitive interpersonal matters require human judgment.

Organizations seeking to make their security staff dramatically more effective will see significant returns. The Intelligence Engine amplifies human capability.

What we acknowledge:

Confidence scores, not certainty

Why the The system provides probability assessments and escalates uncertainty.system made each assessment

Continuous improvement

False positives reduce over time through supervised learning; they don't disappear immediately.

Implementation investment

Meaningful automation requires configuration, testing, and organizational change.

Fit assessment

Some environments aren't ready for AI-assisted security operations.

Questions to ask any vendor (including us):

  • "Show me the reasoning chain for a decision." The Intelligence Engine exposes how it reached every conclusion.
  • "What happens when the system is wrong?" Human override, escalation paths, and learning mechanisms are built into the architecture.
  • "How does the system adapt to our specific environment?" Site-specific tuning, behavioral baselines, and localized doctrine.
  • "What's the boundary between automatic and human-approved actions?" Graduated autonomy with configurable thresholds.
  • "How do we validate before going live?" Simulation Playground for testing against historical and synthetic scenarios.

Section 09 |

From Assessment to Production

Deployment Built for Enterprise Security

Implementation follows a structured path designed for security operations that cannot afford disruption.

Foundation

(Weeks 1-8)

Before the Intelligence Engine, the Integration Fabric must be in place. If you're already connected through Mithriv, this phase validates existing integrations and identifies gaps.

Activities:

Integration audit: Verify data flow from all connected systems

Baseline capture: Establish normal patterns for your environment

SOP inventory: Document existing procedures for encoding

Stakeholder mapping: Identify approval chains and escalation paths

Deliverable: Readiness assessment with gap remediation plan

Doctrine Encoding

(Weeks 8-10)

Your operational doctrine becomes executable logic.

Activities:

SOP translation: Convert procedures to decision logic

Policy hierarchy: Define which policies apply in which contexts

Exception handling: Document how edge cases should be managed

Approval workflows: Encode authorization requirements

Deliverable: Doctrine Library configured for your organization

Simulation & Calibration

(Weeks 10-14)

Extensive testing in the Simulation Playground before any automation goes live.

Activities:

Historical replay: Run past incidents through the Intelligence Engine

Scenario testing: Execute synthetic scenarios across all encoded SOPs

Threshold tuning: Calibrate confidence levels for appropriate action triggers

Gap identification: Find scenarios your doctrine doesn't address

Deliverable: Validated configuration with documented coverage and gaps

Supervised Deployment

(Weeks 14-18)

Go live at L0/L1 autonomy, the Intelligence Engine recommends, humans execute.

Activities:

Production deployment with full monitoring

Operator training on new workflows

Daily review of recommendations vs. actions taken

Refinement based on real-world performance

Deliverable: Production system with validated performance metrics

Graduated Autonomy

(Ongoing)

Systematically increase automation based on proven performance.

Activities:

Performance analysis by scenario type

Autonomy elevation for proven scenarios

Continuous doctrine updates

Cross-site learning activation

Deliverable: Validated configuration with documented coverage and gaps

Deployment Models

Section 10 |

What Intelligence Delivers

Measured Improvement Across Security Operations

Section 11 |

 The Decision Layer

Intelligence That Secures Your Physical World

Your cameras see everything. Your access control logs everything. Your analytics detect everything.
The Intelligence Engine correlates across systems, applies your doctrine, and acts, at machine speed, within human control.

Related resources